Getting 2000 AutoCad do I need a floppy to start program?

Discussion in 'AutoCAD' started by PeterM, Sep 19, 2003.

  1. PeterM

    PeterM Guest

    I'm possibly getting a AutoCad program (2000), a full version, not an
    upgrade and not a Academic version either. In order to run this program,
    will I have to register it for it to run, do I have to have a floppy
    disk, to run or install the program from the original CD? Any help is
    appreciated. I'm not a Cad person, but my son is getting the urge to use
    and of course learn how to use AutoCad, so I like to help
    him........Peter
     
    PeterM, Sep 19, 2003
    #1
  2. PeterM

    Smackypete Guest

    A) There is no difference between a full version and an
    upgrade.
    B) It installs right off of the CD
    C) You will have to register it (it will run for 30 days
    unregistered)

    If you are not buying a autohorized copy from a dealer,
    don't expect much support from the folks in these neswgroups
    and maybe you should look at getting a free version of
    IntelliCAD. If you are buying from an Autodesk dealer, then
    he should be happy to answer all your questions.
     
    Smackypete, Sep 20, 2003
    #2
  3. PeterM

    PeterM Guest

    Thank you for the information. I was a little shocked about the
    possibility of not getting much support from members of NG's like this.
    I can understand not getting much support, or none for that matter, from
    Autodesk, but I would be surprised at a negative reaction from anybody
    in this NG. I would only ask why. Is everybody that would not help me so
    loyal to Autodesk? I would personally not worry about it, but it would
    nevertheless alarm me a little as to the strange behavior.
     
    PeterM, Sep 20, 2003
    #3
  4. There is a slight difference. A friend who "collects" software tried
    to install an upgrade version, I don't remember whether it was AutoCAD
    or LT 2000. He has a deal with a friend, and they each send each
    other copies of all the software that they or their families purchase.

    It didn't work, and he asked me for help. I learned that the upgrade
    version looks for evidence on your computer that a legitimate version
    had been installed previously. It's not a single thing like aclt.exe
    or a registry, more likely a combination of things.

    Later I purchased AutoCAD LT 2000i for my own use. I don't remember
    being required to register, but I could be wrong.

    Steven
     
    Steve M (remove wax for reply), Sep 20, 2003
    #4
  5. PeterM

    PeterM Guest

    Thank you Steven, I hope my situation works out similar to yours. I kind
    of like to introduce my son to the program. He usually contracts out the
    AutoCad work. I'm the only old guy in the family that still has a full
    copy of a version of AutoCad that was in DOS. It was complicated then
    and I'm sure the Window version is as complicated. I could get a pirated
    (new) version of AutoCad but we don't like to even go there. That is why
    I was asking about an older original version (2000) that I could
    buy/trade from a neighbor, and just find out a little about using it
    legally. If my son likes the program, he or I will buy a full version of
    the latest AutoCad. It may never happen, but we will have fun using the
    program a little. I'm sure you have to be very smart to be able to use
    the program, but trying to learn is fun as well.........Thanks Steven
     
    PeterM, Sep 20, 2003
    #5
  6. Another suggestion: If you end up buying AutoCAD, and especially if
    you're just starting and want to learn, consider the LT version. I
    bought LT because I only needed to edit text (I'm a technical
    translator, work in Spanish-English).

    The major differences, from what I remember, are:

    (1) lack of programming -- there are some simple steps that you can
    assign to buttons in LT, but not everything. There's also something
    called DIESEL, which I didn't understand one bit.

    You can buy add-ons that add a programming language, and increase the
    capability of LT. I bought one that adds AutoLISP, because I wanted
    to convert consecutive lines of TEXT entities to MTEXT before
    translation.

    (2) more difficult (but not impossible) to draw or view in 3D.

    (3) In general, LT has fewer features, less customization, database
    connectivity, etc. etc.

    My own very unscientific opinion is that as many as 75-90% of AutoCAD
    users could actually use LT instead. Also, IIRC, these features in
    general only affect how you create or generate drawings. If you want
    to just view or plot, or make minor changes in drawings created in
    full AutoCAD, LT should have enough capability.

    Steven


     
    Steve M (remove wax for reply), Sep 20, 2003
    #6
  7. PeterM

    Ron O Guest

    Hi Steve

    What is the name of the add-on that adds AutoLISP. I use AutoLISP very much,
    and therefore I bought a full version. But if I can do with only LT and an
    add-on that would suffice for about 80% of my work.

    -snip-
    Ron Oosterwijk
     
    Ron O, Oct 9, 2003
    #7
  8. PeterM

    Michael W Guest

    There are several LISP add-ons for LT. If you are using up to 2002,
    LT-Extender is very good value ($100US I think). They are still working on
    adding Lisp to 2004, just ARX for 2004 so far.

    Another that is popular is DRCAuto's LT Toolkit for $350 US, and does work
    with 2004.

    Both options are a lot better value than paying the cost of full Acad, if
    LISP and ARX are needed.

    Mike
     
    Michael W, Oct 9, 2003
    #8
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.