Fustration

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Wilbert, Feb 11, 2004.

  1. Wilbert

    Wilbert Guest

    Could the frustration with Solidworks since approx V2001 not be traced back
    to when it was purchased by Dassault?
    Don't remember date of acquisition but there could be a link of satisfying
    shareholders instead of users.
    Hm........
     
    Wilbert, Feb 11, 2004
    #1
  2. Wilbert

    Eddy Hicks Guest

    I dug this is up... a release from '97
    - - - - -
    "CONCORD, Mass., June 24 (Reuter) - Dassault Systemes SA and SolidWorks said
    on Tuesday they entered an agreement for Dassault to acquire SolidWorks for
    4.85 million Dassault shares, in a deal valued at $310 million.

    SolidWorks develops and markets 3D mechanical design solutions for the
    Windows platform and is expected to have annualized revenues of $25 million
    based on results expected for the quarter ending June 30, 1997, the
    companies
    said in a joint statement.
    Dassault Systemes expects the deal to be "less than five percent dilutive to
    earnings in the second half of 1997, and to be non-dilutive in 1998."

    The deal is expected to be "a significant contributor to earnings growth
    thereafter," Dassault said.

    Dassault and SolidWorks expect the deal to be completed in the 1997 third
    quarter, pending regulatory and shareholder approvals.

    SolidWorks will operate as a separate subsidiary of Dassault Systemes with
    its current management team.

    The companies said SolidWorks has significant growth potential because of
    increased demand by engineers for its modeling capabilities with ease of
    use,
    as well as affordability."
    - - - - -

    I think it's safe to say the vast majority of users didn't have much
    experience with Solidworks prior to Dassault owning them. I bought my first
    seats around the time of the takeover and demo'd SW'95 long before that. As
    much as I'd like to blame Dassault, they've pretty much been around the
    whole time for most of us, for better or worse.

    BTW, I also found this humorous mcad timeline...

    http://www.edeinc.com/Cadence/98Mar/timeline.html


    - Eddy
     
    Eddy Hicks, Feb 11, 2004
    #2
  3. Check what happened to SW in 2002 (SW2001+) then...
     
    Philippe Guglielmetti, Feb 11, 2004
    #3
  4. Jan-96 Product Model Data Exchange is standardized by 'STEP'


    Sad it is a great solid exchange format that nobody uses. Anytime I try to
    get models people always say "How about IGES." I respond "No, STEP is much
    better." they reply "What is STEP."
     
    Corey Scheich, Feb 11, 2004
    #4
  5. Wilbert

    Eddy Hicks Guest

    ?


     
    Eddy Hicks, Feb 11, 2004
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
There are no similar threads yet.
Loading...