Form/Fit/Function vs. Minor/Major Revision - Definition

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Len K. Mar, Sep 23, 2003.

  1. Len K. Mar

    Len K. Mar Guest

    Hi,

    I have a client who wants to know if there is a standard to define
    major/minor revisions and how do you determine it using Form Fit
    Function.

    He says everyone uses it but nobody can refer him to a standard
    reference that spells this out in black and white.

    How does your company deal with these issues?

    Len
     
    Len K. Mar, Sep 23, 2003
    #1
  2. Len K. Mar

    Habib Guest

    Hello towards you Mr. Len.

    The revison of the minor types are if or why the parts can be used in a
    backwards fashion.

    So while the new part can be made to substitute on the old part it is a
    minor revision to make.

    But for to make the major revisions is to make parts that become not
    backwards campatability.

    So when new part is compatible with exsisting already parts it is small
    revision but if not backward compatible then it became major.

    This is the primariey differences to think upon.

    Thank you very much please,

    Habib
     
    Habib, Sep 23, 2003
    #2
  3. Len,
    Here are my responses:
    ASME Y14.35M-1997 "Revision of Engineering Drawings and Associated
    Documents"
    This specification defines evrything you need to know about the
    Revisions including Form, Fit & Function.
    Form: The shape, size, dimensions, mass, weight and other physical
    parameters
    which uniquely characterize an item.
    Fit: The ability of an item to physically interface or interconnect
    with or
    become an intregal part of another item.
    Function: The action or actions which an item is designed to perform.
    Whereever I have worked an EO (Engineering Order) always has a
    clasification
    which basically stated a Conditio or Type as in I or II:
    Type I: Interchangeability, Form, Fit or Function are violated.
    Type II: No effect on Interchangeability, Form, Fit or Function.
    Usually
    clerical error, minor corrections, typos, etc.

    If the reference to the above is to the classification, then this is
    covered
    in the ASME spec. If this is not what you are referring to then my
    only other
    guess would be that they are making reference to Minor/Major
    Characteristics.
    If this is the case than they are talking about Quality Inspection
    Levels or
    AQL's, for this, see MIL-STD-105. Using this standard, any aspect of
    any item
    defined on a drawing can be classified as Minor, Major or Critical
    100%
    inspection required.
    Hope this clarifies things,
    ......................................Eddie
     
    Eddie Cyganik, Sep 26, 2003
    #3
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.