external reference frustration

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by donk, Sep 1, 2008.

  1. donk

    donk Guest

    I have an assembly that contain parts (as well as sub-assemblies) that
    are all defined completely within the assembiy, and saved externally.

    No matter what I try I cannot save the main assembly under a new name
    using "save as" and "references" and maintain the references in
    context. I keep getting question marks on all the
    parts/sub-assemblies when I open the newly-saved assembly. I've tried
    saving the parts/sub-assembiles in a new folder, renaming them using
    the suffix/prefix option, checking and unchecking the "save as copy"
    options, played a bit with System Options - External References, but
    nothing seems to work.

    Am I doing something wrong? Very frustrated about this; help greatly
    appreciated!

    I'm using SW2008, SP4.0 on WinXP.
     
    donk, Sep 1, 2008
    #1
  2. donk

    jon_banquer Guest

    Don't you just love parametric-history based modeling?

    Ever wonder if this kind of B.S. is really worth it or necessary?

    Jon Banquer
    San Diego, CA
    http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
     
    jon_banquer, Sep 1, 2008
    #2
  3. donk

    jon_banquer Guest

    Don't you just love parametric-history based modeling?

    Ever wonder if this kind of B.S. is really worth it or necessary?

    Jon Banquer
    San Diego, CA
    http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
     
    jon_banquer, Sep 2, 2008
    #3
  4. donk

    donk Guest

    Anyone have any idea about how to solve this?
     
    donk, Sep 2, 2008
    #4
  5. donk

    jon_banquer Guest

    The best way to solve it is to get away from parametric-history based
    modeling and use better technology. I'm sure this isn't the answer you
    want to hear but it is the best answer and it is an honest answer.

    Jon Banquer
    San Diego, CA
    http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
     
    jon_banquer, Sep 2, 2008
    #5
  6. donk

    That70sTick Guest

    Have you tried using SW Explorer to rename the top level?
     
    That70sTick, Sep 2, 2008
    #6
  7. donk

    jon_banquer Guest

    Hey now, Roland. Where is your Solidworks spirit? Have him send you
    the assembly. In five minutes you will have it figured out. ;>)

    ROTFLMFAO

    Jon Banquer
    San Diego, CA
    http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
     
    jon_banquer, Sep 2, 2008
    #7
  8. donk

    donk Guest

    Tried using SW Explorer... worked like a damn!

    Many thanks guys!

    I just wonder why "save as" + references didn't work. It did work a
    couple of times before, but just seemed to stop suddenly.

    BTW I'm usually very careful with references. Parts NEVER reference
    each other in my assemblies. That seems to usually keep the hoopla
    down to a mimimum.

    Cheers.
     
    donk, Sep 2, 2008
    #8
  9. donk

    j Guest

    I believe that the save as + references in 2008 is a huge bug. It hasn't
    worked since 2008 came out so I don't use it anymore but use SWExplorer
    as well.
     
    j, Sep 2, 2008
    #9
  10. donk

    Cliff Guest

    IOW You have no clues what was being asked about and no
    answer.
    IOW You have no clues what was being asked about and no
    answer.
    And anything else is the answer, right?
    Tell us all how. Exactly.
     
    Cliff, Sep 2, 2008
    #10
  11. donk

    Cliff Guest

    Everybody except the clueless idiot probably noticed that.
    As always. Just (clueless) hype & buzzwords solve all problems,
    right?

    Not even that.
     
    Cliff, Sep 2, 2008
    #11
  12. donk

    Cliff Guest

    Ignore that idiot. He has no idea what you were asking about ...
    more proof (as if any more was needed) that he's not & never
    has been a user, much less even a pretend "expert".

    Wait a little & real users will see your post .. it was a 3
    day holiday in the US.
     
    Cliff, Sep 2, 2008
    #12
  13. donk

    jon_banquer Guest

    The best way to solve it is to get away from parametric-history based
    modeling and use better technology. I'm sure this isn't the answer you
    want to hear but it is the best answer and it is an honest answer.

    Jon Banquer
    San Diego, CA
    http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
     
    jon_banquer, Sep 2, 2008
    #13
  14. donk

    jon_banquer Guest

    The best way to solve it is to get away from parametric-history based
    modeling and use better technology. I'm sure this isn't the answer you
    want to hear but it is the best answer and it is an honest answer.

    Jon Banquer
    San Diego, CA
    http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
     
    jon_banquer, Sep 3, 2008
    #14
  15. donk

    zoober Guest

    jon, you wouldn't know parametric modeling if it bit you in the ass.
     
    zoober, Sep 4, 2008
    #15
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.