Does ne1 try to do a staggered pattern using WF2?

Discussion in 'Pro/Engineer & Creo Elements/Pro' started by John, Sep 17, 2004.

  1. John

    John Guest

    Greetings:

    Does anyone try to create a staggered pattern find generally in D-Sub
    connector using WF2? If so, do you still use idx technique e.g.
    writting a relation or there is a better way?

    I try to use Pattern - Fill - References (Internal sketch) - Sketch a
    parallellogram which 4 corner located at the center of the 4 outsides
    holes - Space Member in "Triangle" pattern - The spacing between
    column is 2.77. The result looks like this
    http://home.comcast.net/~wangphk/ProE/Parts/Area-Fill-Pattern.jpg.
    Note, the second row of holes is shifted upward a little bit instead
    of aligning with the bottom sketch entities. Since the row and column
    spacing is different 2.84 & 2.77 respectively, I am wondering if it
    would be possible to specify the row spacing dimension using this
    technique.

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    John
     
    John, Sep 17, 2004
    #1
  2. John

    Pete Guest


    John

    I would do a directional pattern (not dimension). Define the
    upper-leftmost pin and then pattern it to the right and down 1 row.
    Since a 25 pin connector is 13 on top and 12 on the bottom (staggered)
    I would make the pattern for 52 instances (26 on top row and 26 on
    bottom row) and then uncheck every other black dot. Start with the
    second one on the top row and the first one on the bottom row. It
    should yield 25 pins.

    Regards
     
    Pete, Sep 18, 2004
    #2
  3. John

    John Guest

    Peter:

    Thank you for your suggestion and help.

    Will your technic works to make a family of D-SUB connector? In other
    word, do I have to check/uncheck every black dot for each one of the
    9, 15, 25, 37 position configuration? If so, it could be a very time
    consuming process. Don't you think?

    I would give it a shot and see if I can make a family of D-SUB using
    this technic.

    John
     
    John, Sep 21, 2004
    #3
  4. John

    Pete Guest

    John,


    Making a family table out of it would not work with that technique.
    Instead I think I would create two separate protrusions, one for the
    top row and one for the bottom row, and create individual patterns for
    each so that you are not un-checking the black dots. Then I would
    create the family table and define the different dims/spacing/qty for
    each permutation of the D-sub.

    Regards
     
    Pete, Sep 22, 2004
    #4
  5. John

    John Guest

    Peter:

    Thank you for your time and input.

    John
     
    John, Sep 23, 2004
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.