COSMOS/Works vs. Ansys for SolidWorks

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Richard Doyle, Nov 3, 2003.

  1. Has anyone had experience with both programs? Pros? Cons?

    Is the ANSYS interface to SolidWorks complete? Why would you choose one over
    the other?

    Thanks.

    Richard Doyle
    Manitex, Inc.
     
    Richard Doyle, Nov 3, 2003
    #1
  2. Richard,

    Here's what I wrote a couple of weeks ago:

    We've been looking at FEA packages here and one of us spent quite a bit of
    time recently trying out demo versions. His take on CosmosWorks was that it
    was easy to use but doesn't have much capability, meaning that we would have
    to go to CosmosM and/or DesignStar, which weren't as easy to use. He was
    also unimpressed with the mesher and the technical help. Another downside is
    that SW is tied up while it solves.

    He preferred NE/Nastran to Cosmos, as it seemed more stable and had good
    capability for a reasonable price. The mesher was better, but still had
    trouble on some of our "swoopy" parts. Technical help wasn't very good
    (although others in this group have commented on their good technical
    service).

    His favorite was Ansys, primarily due to its stability, the robust mesher,
    and the excellent technical service. The Workbench interface is intuitive,
    easy to use, and reads SW files, but you have to use the Classic interface
    to do nonlinear materials, which is not so easy to use. It's more expensive
    than the others for the same capability.

    After I wrote that, my colleague who was doing the comparisons got an email
    from the folks at NE/Nastran asking what problems we had with their
    technical support. He wrote back to say that, unlike what I wrote above, it
    wasn't that their technical support was bad, just that the technical support
    from the local Ansys VAR (JLR in the Seattle area) was incredibly good.

    The Ansys interface to SW seems to be quite good (given that we only had a
    month of playing with it). As noted above, only certain types of analysis
    are included in the Workbench interface that has the SW link. If you want to
    run non-linear material analyses, for example, you have to transfer to the
    Classic interface, which is not nearly as friendly. They are adding more
    capability to the Workbench interface with each release, so this may not be
    a problem for too much longer. On the other hand, NE/Nastran is bringing out
    a SW link in the next 6 months or so. You might want to look at it as well.

    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
     
    Jerry Steiger, Nov 3, 2003
    #2
  3. Richard Doyle

    ms Guest

    Ansys is definitely the Cadillac of FEA, but comes at a Cadillac price.
    Cosmos is more like a good Chevy both in price and capability.
     
    ms, Nov 4, 2003
    #3
  4. Cosmos is a Chevy all right…a 1973 Chevy Vega. I had one once and the
    engine fell out. NE/Nastran is a great product and the only weakness
    is the lack of an integrated CAD option. I understand that will
    change soon (check out www.neicad.com). If you compare price and
    performance you cannot beat NE/Nastran. Also has the same super fast
    PCGLSS solvers as does Cosmos. I agree that ANSYS is a nice package
    but it is difficult to use and is expensive to get and maintain. But
    I would put NE/Nastran up there with it for capability and
    performance.

    Cosmos is a Chevy all right…a 1973 Chevy Vega. I had one once and the
    engine fell out. NE/Nastran is a great product and the only weakness
    is the lack of an integrated CAD option. I understand that will
    change soon (check out www.neicad.com). If you compare price and
    performance you cannot beat NE/Nastran. Also has the same super fast
    PCGLSS solvers as does Cosmos. I agree that ANSYS is a nice package
    but it is difficult to use and is expensive to get and maintain. But
    I would put NE/Nastran up there with it for capability and
    performance.
     
    Philip Aataro, Nov 5, 2003
    #4
  5. Richard Doyle

    Squarepusher Guest

    You should take a peek at Pro/Mechanica (Runs in Idependent and Integrated
    (ie within Pro/E) modes).
    I use this with CATIA v4 and it works very well.
    Quick, easy interface, with an accomplished toolset, solver and optimisation
    tools.

    Solidworks has the capability to export to Pro/E which works quite well with
    Pro/Mec for obvious reasons.

    I would say that it is not as accomplished as an ANSYS as FEA tools go, but
    as a design tool it is excellent.

    Cheers

    Sq.
     
    Squarepusher, Nov 5, 2003
    #5
  6. Richard Doyle

    SD Guest

    Does anyone have experince using the Electrial simulations with either
    package?

    I need to analize some high power connectors.

    thanks,
    SD
     
    SD, Nov 7, 2003
    #6
  7. Thanks for the replies everyone. We'll be seeing a demo of the Ansys for
    SolidWorks product this week.

    Richard
     
    Richard Doyle, Nov 10, 2003
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.