convert SW 2006 to Sw 2005 ? ?

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by f costa, Nov 29, 2005.

  1. f costa

    f costa Guest

    How to convert .sldprt vers 2006 to .sldprt vers 2005 ?

    Thanks

    FaB-26
     
    f costa, Nov 29, 2005
    #1
  2. f costa

    Jean Marc Guest

    No smart convert: 2006 to parasolid to 2005. Question asked almost every
    month on this forum.
     
    Jean Marc, Nov 29, 2005
    #2
  3. f costa

    SoCalMike Guest

    If your looking for a way to convert a 2006 file to 2005, and still
    maintain the feature tree, its impossible. Like mentioned above you
    can save the 2006 file as an .X_T parasolid, but you will loose the
    features in the feature tree. This is known as a dumb solid. The
    inability to save solidworks files back to earlier versions has long
    been a complaint of many users, and can be frustrating if your
    customers dont stay up to date with their versions. The same used to
    hold true for Autocad drawings, untill DWG editor gained popularity.
     
    SoCalMike, Nov 29, 2005
    #3
  4. f costa

    YouGoFirst Guest

    You do gain many of the features if you have the feature recognizer turned
    on. I have taken some simple parts hand had them successfully create a
    feature tree for the part.
     
    YouGoFirst, Nov 29, 2005
    #4
  5. f costa

    modelsin3d Guest

    This is a big double edge sword, IMO. It would be nice to have the
    ability to just open files and have them be backwards compatible. But
    then I ask the question, what would the "Flex" feature be before 2005?
    What would you make a new function be in the older version? Not saying
    that it can't be done, but how can you have the parametrics or control
    over a feature that did not exist? Or at least not in the same way in
    the older version. Sweep with a Twist.... prior to 2005, what would
    that be?

    Not trying to start a war or anything, just throwing it out there for
    response as to how this could be handled with the intelligence that we
    created with. I agree, feature recognition is a great tool, but getting
    some things to come back that are not so prismatic might be harder and
    you have to do it manually.
     
    modelsin3d, Nov 29, 2005
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.