Better equation management tools?

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by m, Jun 25, 2008.

  1. m

    m Guest

    Just ran into a problem. Trying to use equations to parametrically
    drive a number of fins on a design. A master fin is patterned. The
    idea was to drive the fin count and spacing with formulas and then use
    various configurations to play with different options.

    It's a simple matter to connect the pattern count to an equation.
    It's also simple to then use this count and the available length to
    figure out the resulting fin spacing.

    The problem is that you can't change these as you add configurations
    to the part. All you can do is suppress or un-suppress equations.

    So...you would have to have ten different "fin count" equations, each
    one activated by the corresponding configuration.

    OK, so, maybe you can deal with this...a bit of a pain, but maybe not
    so bad.

    The problem comes in when you decide to add a couple of new configs
    after you've set all of this up. What happens is that equations are
    evaluated in the order they were entered, so a "fin count" equation
    that comes after the "fin spacing" calculation equation is not seen by
    the calc. When you suppress all prior "fin count" equations and
    enable the new one, all prior calculations based on the new "fin
    count" equation fail.

    What's needed is a way to be able to move equations up and down in the
    list.

    Or, better yet, to be able to create equations that have the ability
    to have different values assigned on a configuration-by-configuration
    basis.

    Any ideas?

    -Martin
     
    m, Jun 25, 2008
    #1
  2. m

    That70sTick Guest

    A couple things:

    1. Always use a design table to regulate config-specific equations.
    Otherwise, suppression states can be unstable.

    2. Perhaps you don't need to have your "master" equation be config-
    specific. Perhaps just one or two of the parameters can be config-
    specific.

    3. Sounds like you could come up with a single generic equation that
    would work for all configs, if you're willing to do enough algebra and
    careful typing.

    4. You can cut-paste to rearrange equation order under "Edit All".
     
    That70sTick, Jun 25, 2008
    #2
  3. m

    Guest Guest

    Use a design table?

    Bob
     
    Guest, Jun 25, 2008
    #3
  4. m

    mr.T Guest

    How about creating sketch with dimensioned line and having dimension value controlling your pattern qty, using equation
    or design tables this will work with configurations



    Just an idea I have use somewhere, sometime ago.
     
    mr.T, Jun 25, 2008
    #4
  5. m

    m Guest

    How about creating sketch with dimensioned line and having dimension value controlling your pattern qty, using equation
    This is a good cheat 'cause you can't drive equations from a design
    table. Not what I would consider "elegant" but probably do-able as
    long as you name the sketch something sensible and add a note to let
    others know why you have this sketch that doesn't seem to do anything.

    -Martin
     
    m, Jun 26, 2008
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.