AutoCAD vs. AutoCAD Lt

Discussion in 'AutoCAD' started by Dneck, Feb 20, 2007.

  1. Dneck

    Dneck Guest

    I run a small landscape architecture firm and we are debating about
    whether or not to upgrade to full blown AutoCAD or settle for AutoCAD
    lt. I am trying to get a straight answer from someone on what the
    real differences are and cannot seem to get a straight answer from my
    friendly neighborhood AutoCAD salesman (suprise!)
    We do a lot of drafting work, use xrefs, and from time to time import
    raster images into our drawings.
    If LT does this for $800 per station, then what justification is there
    for spending $3K per station on AutoCAD?
    Am I missing something here?
     
    Dneck, Feb 20, 2007
    #1
  2. Dneck

    Jerry G Guest

    The items I can think of off the top of my head are 3d and LISP and 3rd
    party add-ons. LT has extremely limited abilities to automate routine
    processes, and 3d, while not very good in either version, is much worse
    in LT. Also you may find that there are vendors that have developed
    specific functions that would be of value to you, but require full-blown
    Autocad with its lisp and other less pronounced capabilities to work. If
    none of these items is particularly important to you, then you probably
    can save the money. HOWEVER there are definitely lisp/vba scripts out
    there that you can download for free or very little money that will help
    you even if you aren't really using much else in the liap type of functions.
     
    Jerry G, Feb 20, 2007
    #2
  3. Dneck

    strawberry Guest

    No. But take a look a things like slingshot from drcauto if you
    haven't already.

    If you're satisfied with what you've got, you probably don't need to
    change it - although you could consider upgrading one workstation and
    seeing what benefit that affords to the practice as a whole.
     
    strawberry, Feb 20, 2007
    #3
  4. Dneck

    Chip Harper Guest

    LT doesn't support working with images. There are work-arounds, you may not
    like the result. Yes LT honors xrefs, but it does not support the xref
    commands available in the full version, like x-clip. Since you indicate that
    you are a landscaping architectural firm, I would recommend the full
    version. If you were a landscaping contractor I would say go with LT. You
    may want to split the difference and buy at least one seat of full version
    and LT for the rest.
     
    Chip Harper, Feb 20, 2007
    #4
  5. Dneck

    strawberry Guest

    just curious - what actually happens when you type _image?
     
    strawberry, Feb 21, 2007
    #5
  6. Dneck

    Paul Turvill Guest

    The "Image Manager" window opens; it allows you to work with images that may
    already be in the drawing, but there's no "import" or "insert" option.
    ___
     
    Paul Turvill, Feb 21, 2007
    #6
  7. Dneck

    strawberry Guest

    ah yes, now I remember - that's where drcauto comes in
     
    strawberry, Feb 21, 2007
    #7
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.