Assura

Hi.
When I try to run Assura in my layout window, I got an error message in
CIW called:
undefined function: vuiDRCrun

Does anyone know how to solve it?

sincerely

 

It looks like some kind of installation problem to me. What versions of
assura and DFII are you running?

Andrew.

 

Hi,
I found we have a directory called assura3.1. But I don't know
how to set it up. Even my cdsdoc command doesn't have items for assura.
Do you know how to set assura up?

Thank you very much!


sincerely

 

Don't top-post, please.

1) Your Assura version must match up with your icfb version;
there are seperate Assura 3.1.X CDROM images for IC446,
IC50, IC5033, etc. So make sure that matches up first.

2) Set the environment variable ASSURAHOME before running
icfb.

That's it. Now all you need is DRC/LVS/RCX flows, which is quite
another issue.

-Jay-

 

Hi,
I defined ASSURAHOME in my .cshrc file:

setenv ASSURAHOME /cad/cds/assura3.12

Also I have included all the paths of bin directories under
/cad/cds/assura3.12. I am using IC5.033. So I think assura3.12
is a matched version of assura. But still I got error message:
*Error* eval: undefined function - vuiDRCRun

What's wrong with it?


sincerely

 

You're still top-posting.

Could be as simple as a missing tools.whatever -> tools link.

The person responsible for installation needs to read the Cadence
installation docs carefully.

-Jay-

 

You're being a bit picky about about this... just because you
don't like it, doesn't mean everyone else is bothered.

Personally I don't particularly like bottom posting, because it means you have
to wade through all the stuff you've already read in previous postings, if
you've been following the thread.

But I don't get so bothered about it that I keep pointing it out...

(And yes, I know there is a logical reason for top posting, given how
we in the English speaking world read from top to bottom).

Andrew.

 

Andrew> On 19 Jul 2004 17:05:40 -0700,

Andrew> You're being a bit picky about about this... just because
Andrew> you don't like it, doesn't mean everyone else is bothered.

Andrew> Personally I don't particularly like bottom posting,
Andrew> because it means you have to wade through all the stuff
Andrew> you've already read in previous postings, if you've been
Andrew> following the thread.

I am sure most people are too polite to be picky. But, I personally
much prefer bottom posting. I follow enough newsgroups and stories to
lose track of which message belongs in which thread. Figuring out the
context of a top-posted message is much harder than for a bottom
posted message. Of course, one has to take out non-relevant portions
from the quote to keep messages within reasonable size. I generally
agree with the points made in http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html,
though I don't hold as strong an opinion.

That being said, I would much rather have people reply to messages,
because I think I value messages far more for their content than for their
posting style. That is especially true for Andrew's messages.

Satya

 

Basically, I agree. I think it is best to trim posts and respond to relevent
portions without including ALL of the post being responded to. It is quite
easy to go to groups.google.com to pull out the history -- assuming, of
course, that someone isn't using the "noarchive" flag in the header to prevent
archiving of their posts -- or to configure newsreaders like NetScape to
preserve the history for as long as it remains on your local server (I don't
know about IE because I refuse to use IE except where I don't have a choice).

However, I do believe there are exceptions, such as when one is making a
general comment relative to the thread, or responding to the post as a whole
but not addressing specific points. In that case a top post may be better.
And in fact, I do occasionally top-post for such things.

Of course, if you use Outlook (which I do occasionally for email -- never for
newsgroups [I don't know if it is usable for newsgroups]), it encourages
top-responses, which may be fostering this propensity in newsgroups.

[NOTE: I still use "rn" for reading newsgroups...]

-Pete Zakel
()

"Never call a man a fool; borrow from him."