Assembly Sketch Relation problem...

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by cd, Jun 11, 2007.

  1. cd

    cd Guest

    Hi All. I am using most current version SW(2007 SP4). Here is my
    trouble:

    I am designing a mold base. I need to add EJ holes to the EJ plate.
    The inserts are all in place in the Assy, along with current EJ
    locations.

    When I edit the part (in Assy window) I can use Convert entities to
    get my hole locations, but I cant get it to go Concentric with the
    Insert block. (it wont put the concentric relation in to the current
    EJ holes in the Insert blocks). I dont get it, this worked for me
    before. IF there a bug I dont know about??..

    I need this to update the locations automatically if I change the
    insert blocks(Shrink may change).

    Any input is appreciated
     
    cd, Jun 11, 2007
    #1
  2. cd

    FlowerPot Guest

    In order to get good help, you have to be more careful about how you say
    things. I can't decipher what you're saying at all.

    possibilities based on guesses:

    - the things that you are trying to make something else concentric to
    aren't circular. concentric sketch relation or concentric mate? edge or
    face? I'll let you figure out how to figure out if something is circular
    or not

    - if you have already converted a sketch entity, you don't need to make
    it concentric (unless you have the switch turned on that deletes the
    relations as soon as you make them)

    - if you have created a part using a convert entity, you don't need to
    mate that part. That over defines everything.

    - of course you're aware of the difference between an assembly sketch
    and a sketch in a part being edited in the context of an assembly

    Daisy
     
    FlowerPot, Jun 11, 2007
    #2
  3. cd

    cd Guest

    Yeah, Im trying to explain it so it makes sense,lol..here goes:

    Simple holes here. I have an assembly with inserts in it. The inserts
    have holes. I need to project the holes down to another part (EJ
    Plate) in the assembly. I am editing the EJ plate in context in the
    asembly. I can use Derived sketches or can also use Convert entities.

    The problem is, the sketch is not fully defined, I can drag it and
    move it out of position. I try to add a Concentric relation, in
    context to the holes in the upper part of the assy, and its a no go.
    It will snap to the center if dragged, but dont add the relation. I
    also cannot manuall add any relations either.
     
    cd, Jun 11, 2007
    #3
  4. cd

    cd Guest

    Ok, I just talked with SW. I had the No external Refrences checkbox in
    the Assemblys Toolbar checked. Man thats so not obvious,lol... Sorry
    for the stupid question..;) thanks for the help..:)

    CD
     
    cd, Jun 11, 2007
    #4
  5. cd

    FlowerPot Guest

    Ok, there is a function on your Assembly toolbar called "No External
    Relations". This is probably pressed in, and you need to un-press it. It
    looks like a yellow upside down T block with a blue cube with a chain
    link with a red X. You can also get to this setting in Tools Options
    External References => Do not create references external to the model.

    Daisy
     
    FlowerPot, Jun 11, 2007
    #5
  6. cd

    ed_1001 Guest

    Just a tip from my experience. Don't convert entities in context in
    an assembly if you can help it. It can get confusing and is buggy. A
    better idea, IMHO, is to create a sketch in the assembly (better yet,
    a separate component containing only the sketch) with the EJ pin
    locations. Use this to position the holes in all the plates and
    inserts. Easy to change, and I've not had nearly the problems.
     
    ed_1001, Jun 11, 2007
    #6
  7. cd

    cd Guest

    Thanks FlowerPot and Ed..:) I dont do many assemblies latley, so it
    is good to have freindly help.. Beer is on me..
     
    cd, Jun 11, 2007
    #7
  8. cd

    ed_1001 Guest

    Damn, I just re-read my post. You'd think english wasn't my native
    tongue. Not had nearly the problems? Ick.
     
    ed_1001, Jun 11, 2007
    #8
  9. cd

    goatlip Guest

    I agree with Ed on this. I use this method all the time and really
    simplifies the top-down assembly approach, especially with really
    large assemblies that have a lot of inter-part relations. Use a sketch
    that drives the interactions between parts.
     
    goatlip, Jun 11, 2007
    #9
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.