Anybody ever used SurfaceWorks??

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Rocko, Jul 23, 2004.

  1. Rocko

    Rocko Guest

    I was wondering if anyone ever used surfaceworks and is it any good. Is it
    parametric to solids created in SW or is it just independant surfaces and
    when you change the underlying solids it goes to hell
    http://www.aerohydro.com/index.html
     
    Rocko, Jul 23, 2004
    #1
  2. Rocko

    matt Guest

    It's a very good surfacer, parametric and associative with SW data. If you
    need Rhino / Alias modeling but want something more associative, then
    Surfaceworks is cool. The terminology is maybe a little quirky, but it's
    fairly understandable. You build from sketch / curve / edge data and it
    has a feature tree, but it's not history driven. It's fairly easy to
    learn, and has a decent tutorial, but the interface isn't as "developed" as
    the SW interface. It has pretty much remained the same for the past few
    years, with minor improvements.

    matt
     
    matt, Jul 23, 2004
    #2
  3. Rocko

    P. Guest

    You can create some pretty aesthetic surfaces with it and have them
    associative to SW.

    You will find it a bit difficult to learn their lingo. It makes little
    effort to follow SW conventions.

    You will find it little or no use in repairing imported geometry.
     
    P., Jul 25, 2004
    #3
  4. Rocko

    P. Guest

    Oops and I almost forgot, pricewise it is a bit steep and it uses a very
    restrictive licensing scheme (read if you change or reformat your hard
    drive you will be asking for a new license unless you remember to export
    it).

    Rhino and geometry works are two others I would have a look at.
     
    P., Jul 25, 2004
    #4
  5. Rocko

    Deri Jones Guest

    It's used quite a bit in the marine industry (as it allows development of
    multi curved surfaces to flat plate shapes - essential for plating hulls of
    yachts/ trawlers in steel/aluminium). I have a customer that uses it to
    design his boats as the stand alone version (multisurf) and then emails me
    the IGES file output for internal detailing in Solidworks. It seems less
    intuiative to use than Rhino or the other package used a lot in the marine
    industry - Maxsurf from the (very) brief play I had with it, but did seem to
    keep relationships between surfacing work and solids created from them
    (intersection curves) in line, but this was with a very simple test with two
    or three parts created from one of their standard models, so dunno if this
    would scale up to a full model, carrying out complex surfacing commands and
    changing the shapes of surfaces radically.
     
    Deri Jones, Jul 25, 2004
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.