AcadSummaryInfo documentation

Can you read?
That statement is in the conditions for using Google, not this newgroup.
So Google says you can't reproduce the material they have copied from this newgroup! Wow,
nice of them.
Will we have to soon pay a fee to read this newgroup or pay a fee to print out a copy for
reference?

Tom Craft
NOT Copyright (c)2004 Tom Craft
Unauthorized reproduction expressly allowed.

 

Can you read?
That statement is in the conditions for using Google, not this newgroup.
So Google says you can't reproduce the material they have copied from this newgroup! Wow,
nice of them.
Will we have to soon pay a fee to read this newgroup or pay a fee to print out a copy for
reference?

Tom Craft
NOT Copyright (c)2004 Tom Craft
Unauthorized reproduction expressly allowed.

 

That's what i thought. Thanx.

--
Se7en - May contain traces of peanut

Twist of fate; wont give me a break, & myself I'm slow and tired. Ive
got to rise with these blood-shot eyes but I'll keep falling when I'm
higher. Albatross, fly on. ...Fly on'!' (http://theswamp.org/se7en/)

 

It's not really about if/how he gets it, its
about what he's doing with it.



Copyright (c)2004 Tony Tanzillo
Unauthorized reproduction expressly prohibited.

 

What's wrong with taking content from my web site, and
displaying it on his web site? Anything? Posting content
in a public place for public view, does not constitute a
granting to others, the right to publicly reproduce, repost,
redisplay, rebroadcast, retransmit or do anything else with
it, that cleary falls outside of the concept and doctrine
of 'fair use'.

What's wrong with it? I dunno. What's wrong with mooching?



Copyright (c)2004 Tony Tanzillo
Unauthorized reproduction expressly prohibited.

 

Well, if thats "Mooching" Then what would: "flat out try to steal Kenny
Ramage's code and claim it as my own. ("w00t! Look what I did!")
--Hell, my goal is to give him an answer to one of his questions with
some of his code.--" be? )~


--
Se7en - May contain traces of peanut

Twist of fate; wont give me a break, & myself I'm slow and tired. Ive
got to rise with these blood-shot eyes but I'll keep falling when I'm
higher. Albatross, fly on. ...Fly on'!' (http://theswamp.org/se7en/)

 

so it seems you cannot copyright your posts and should probably not try
to sell your software with your signature.

 

in message

Wrong. If you know next-to-nothing about the
legal issue, the only thing you achive by
making these sort of comments are to ridicule
yourself.

If I agree to the terms of the agreement that
you quoted, that does not mean that I relinquish
my rights, it simply means that I am granting
certain rights to Autodesk.

The fact that you can confuse my granting rights
to Autodesk, with my granting rights to Randall
Rath, stands to show that you'd be a lot better
off if you didn't pursue this topic any further.



Copyright (c)2004 Tony Tanzillo
Unauthorized reproduction expressly prohibited.

 

First off, what programmer worth his salt doesn't know how to use a
keyboard call for ©?(alt+0169 for those who'd like to know) Second, you
just smeared egg on your own face bubba. Read the fine print
thouroughly. No really... I mean thoroughly. If you truly have
consulted with an attorney regarding the 'copyright issues', you would
be fully aware that Google has built into that little legal blurb what
is known as 'severability'. In plain english, that is a piece of
verbage that not only removes any liability on Google's part, that
removes any right you have to claim the verbage you post as
proprietary. Or, in the words of my lawyer "if you don't want someone
else to use the information you have, don't give them ANY access to
it!" Think I am just posting out of my nose? Try talking to any Patent
Attorney about any claim you may think you have to something you have
posted in a public forum. Don't just read it online, go and actually
sit in an office with one. You might be suprised at what you find you
can actually claim once it becomes public knowledge.

So pipe down!!! It all goes for the betterment of our little
sub-society anyway.


--
Jim Yadon - KorPRit PunK

X=(A-(B*(C-1)))/2
*y=d-e*
*x,y is the first point*

 

First off, what programmer worth his salt

One that knows that (c) is guaranteed to be
displayed in all viewing contexts, while © is
not? Duh!

Oh, and you're assuming I've no experience in
IP litigation? Unfortunately, that's not the case.

As far as the rest of the mumbling, I'm going to
reserve comment, in anticipation of being able to
offer a different type of response, one with teeth.



Copyright (c)2004 Tony Tanzillo
Unauthorized reproduction expressly prohibited.

 

Thanks. That's pretty much what I had but I didn't realise I had stuffed up the path information for the drawings I was looking at. It's all working sweet now.

By the way what does the LetOff method do? (I don't want to tell you what that means here in Australia! ;-) )

Regards

Wayne

 

Alas, (c) is not the ANSI standard. while an assumed standard, does not
hold sway in actual copyright litigation. Unless your post is in
printed form on file with the Library of Congress or some similar
legally precedented container, © doesn't even mean anything other than
to try and frighten people. 'Take a look here'
(http://tinyurl.com/2tgu7) and you will se that we are in accordance
with your terms. You are receiving credit for your post. Your
authorization is implied by your posting in a fair use forum. As long
as anyone who copies the code or uses the solution you post makes
provision for that in any published work they make, you have no leg to
stand on.

I assumed nothing of the sort Mr. Tanzillo. In fact, by the reactions
you have had here in regards to your signature line, I would say you
either lost or came darn close to losing.

That would be qualified as a threat Mr. Tanzillo. That along with the
other forms of response you have posted effectively negate your
standing. I harbor you no ill will, rather I am mildly amused at the
vigor with which you actively pursue being selfish in a forum that is
dedicated to the helping of one another. Your signature line clearly
indicates that you would rather taunt someone with the knowledge you
have, knowing full well that you may one day be able to haunt them with
it by claiming 'rights' to some snippet of code. I am merely pointing
out how ridiculous you are making yourself look with such juvenile
behaviour. In essence, providing you with the forum with which to
embarass yourself.

So if you are done being self righteous, I would be interested in how
you would choose to solve some of the problems I have seen lain out
before us.

Be bold...
Follow in the footsteps of the selfless...
Start helping people without holding them at the knife point of the
signature you use.
Just because your peers in the field may not agree with you does not
mean we would embarass you.

Besides, can you honestly say that you have never copy-clipped some
snippet of a valuable solution from someone's post and never used it in
your code? Truly... can you?


--
Jim Yadon - KorPRit PunK

X=(A-(B*(C-1)))/2
*y=d-e*
*x,y is the first point*

 

How did all this wasteful discussion get in this thread? And what is it all about? I thought this thread was about how to do a multiple file select box.

Tom Haws (find me at Google)