2004 SP2 is up...

Discussion in 'SolidWorks' started by Jeff N, Dec 17, 2003.

  1. Paul:

    I'm just a guy who does contract work in consumer products. I know it
    would fit your desire to be oppressed better if I were associated with
    a reseller or SW direct, sorry to disappoint. I get paid only when I
    succeed, which is why I work so hard at not letting software beat me.
    I would think in your line of work that you would know better than to
    waste time that doesn't bring in revenue. Why do you think spewing
    bile in the newsgroup is less of a waste of productivity than sending
    bug reports? If you weren't making more money with SW than you could
    with something else, why aren't you using that something else?

    Armadillo Hunter
     
    armadillo hunter, Dec 21, 2003
    #21
  2. Jeff N

    Eddy Hicks Guest

    This is rich... we're supposed to take this seriously? From someone who
    hides behind a handle? Someone who is obviously just holding SW pom-poms?

    This won't matter because I'm on your ignore list, but let's get a few
    things straight...

    1) I own an engineering company. You're welcome to check it out by
    following the url indicated in my reply address (I'm not here to advertise).

    2) At my office we are all high-end SW experts. Not self proclaimed. We
    create high end surfaces, we push sheet metal to its limits, we create
    vacuum formed parts that most users don't have the opportunity to envision,
    as well as injection molded parts, weldments, etc. etc. We do an insane
    amount of work in insanely short periods of time. We are at the top of our
    game. I don't ever ask anyone here to acknowledge that. Our clients
    already do. I put our expertise against anyone's, especially against app
    engineers and SW cheerleaders.

    3) I don't come here to "get a reaction" and I don't believe Mike Wilson has
    ever been guilty of that. From what I can tell he's one of the most capable
    SW users I've ever seen from afar and his posts rarely reach into ranting.
    He speaks the truth but typically does it with a cool solution oriented
    delivery. Your comments about "Wilson" were the most offensive crap in your
    post... and totally off-base. Those comments alone label you an ignorant
    shill.

    4) No, the users here do not typically blame SW whenever a problem crops up.
    In the midst of the small amount of bitching, venting, and chit-chat, there
    is an unbelievable amount of real helpful information. High end users can
    come here to work out surfacing and sheet metal problems and new users can
    come here to feel better that it's not them that's making sketches or
    drawings sooo slow. If you'd like verification of this, re-read the posts,
    paying attention at what people have tried and gone through before coming
    here to begin with. I have a senior engineer that submits a problem report
    to our VAR nearly every time we run across a problem that didn't exist in a
    prior version and whenever there's something that doesn't seem to have a
    logical solution. Our var's engineers always respond and usually end up
    submitting a request to SW. Our var has very capable, approachable
    engineers and we've developed good relationships with them. You know how
    many times they've come back with a legitimate work-around? Less than 25%
    of the time. Not because our var is lacking, which I suspect would be the
    next finger you point, but because we have driven SW since its introduction
    and know how to push it to its limits, before we ask for help. I come here
    to vent, to enlighten, to occasionally help or learn, or for any other
    purpose I deem necessary. Like it or not.

    5) I've said it before, SW is still the best package out there. If there
    was a better option I'd probably be posting in a different group. True,
    they do suck less. That doesn't mean any of us should take poor performance
    or failing features with our shorts down. "If it's that bad, just walk
    away" - that's just ridiculous. Postings that try to temper peoples disdain
    with a bad version are frustrating. It's one thing to suggest we calm down
    and restate our problem but it's another thing entirely to tell us that we
    don't live up to your calm expectations of cheering quietly. I'd prefer to
    tell you that if you don't agree, you're not driving the software hard
    enough but that's not my place. The most frustrating thing of all... I do
    continually choose SW over the others because the market itself can't seem
    to generate a better option. Isn't that sad? That it's 2003 and they're
    are only 2 or 3 real choices to solid modelers for design engineers? I find
    that the real problem, more than SW shortcomings.

    6) The beta program isn't working because, despite the overwhelming
    participation, the software got released with its usual crop of bugs. 2003
    is more bloated and slower than 2001+ and now 2004 is more bloated and
    slower than 2003. They will release what they want, when they want and no
    beta tester is going to change that. SW needs to revamp their priority
    list. They are clearly prioritizing marketing ahead of performance. When
    features get released that don't work and software is slower than it was
    before something is wrong. Many of the problems with 2004 were well
    documented within the beta. Sure some things got "fixed" but those things
    were likely on the to-do list anyway. Exactly how do you feel the beta
    program *is* working - because you were able to see the next version ahead
    of GPR? Lastly, I am more qualified to say that the beta isn't working
    because I am a paying user and they released another pile of major marketing
    trash with minor improvements (shouldn't it be the other way around?).


    - Eddy
     
    Eddy Hicks, Dec 21, 2003
    #22
  3. pardon me for saying this Imadildo Hunter, but if we all add you to our
    That's not precisely true. You will find that I participated somewhat
    in a discussion of the merits of Toolbox. I'm not a fan of that
    software, but rather than continuing to use something which I find so
    lacking, I made my own library rather than endlessly moaning about it.
    Don't complain unless you intend to do something.
    Neil, that's a precious observation. You're assuming that the "bitch
    and moan" club here has something to say that people could benefit
    from. The only people who interest me here are those who can identify
    ways of getting things done when there are difficulties, not people
    who can only identify software problems and turn them into emotional
    subjects. Any moron knows when there's a problem.

    Besides, spectating is preferable to wasting my time arguing with
    folks like you and the others. You all are small corners off of the
    Jon Banquer quilt. Posting nonsense mostly for dramatic effect and
    attention.
    Don't hold your breath. I don't have any pressing need to prove
    myself to you.

    Armadillo Hunter
     
    armadillo hunter, Dec 21, 2003
    #23
  4. Jeff N

    neil Guest

    thanks for the insults -if this NG activity is well beneath you, feel free
    to piss off somewhere else.
     
    neil, Dec 21, 2003
    #24
  5. Jeff N

    JJ Guest

    Mr. "armadillo hunter",

    I agree with a great deal of what you say. Many people come here to "vent"
    because they feel it is in vogue to do so. I think that maybe they get some
    weird kick out of doing so and often have little to contribute to the group.
    Their time would be better spent sending in SPRs and often times the problem
    is due to their lack of experience. The abundance of these types of rants
    detracts from the usefulness of the group and makes it a less welcome place
    to visit for users who simply come here for information and to further their
    skills.

    BUT, Mr. Wilson does not fall into the above category by any means. He is
    consistently one of the most skillful and generous contributors to this
    forum, one of the best at finding and disseminating workarounds, and one of
    the most tolerant of the software's flaws. When he is pushed to the breaking
    point, I believe it is for a good reason. That is to say, you've picked the
    wrong target for your post.

    JJ
     
    JJ, Dec 21, 2003
    #25
  6. Jeff N

    jon banquer Guest


    "Besides, spectating is preferable to wasting my time
    arguing with folks like you and the others. You all are
    small corners off of the Jon Banquer quilt. Posting
    nonsense mostly for dramatic effect and attention."

    At least your agenda is now out.... how's it workin for ya ?


    ROTFLMFAO.

    I post here for one reason and one reason only.... to get
    the needed changes made in Solidworks that I know are major
    problems such as Solidworks continued inability to work on
    non-native imported surface geometry, SolidWorks inability
    to easily create surfaces and splines with C2 like many
    other systems can, etc.

    That this annoys imbeciles like you bothers me in the least.

    Perhaps you should consider taking my "quilt" and getting
    stuffed. Might hurt less than using your armadildo.

    jon
     
    jon banquer, Dec 21, 2003
    #26
  7. Dasypodidae Predator,

    Well, I'll say this,.. I'm not oppressed and I make a good living as a
    independent designer and I work hard at workaround things (sometimes a
    indirect issue relating to SW = bitching).
    I hear what you are saying about moaning, whining, bitching and time
    wasted but actually it does have it's rewards, and usually I bitch about
    regressions or when my models fail. I'm not going to judge why people
    need to bitch about stuff, and even the best ng's have these issues.
    Overall this ng is above average and fairly productive. The ability of
    the reader/writer to filter in/out information regardless of it's
    pos/neg intent is what a public ng is and that is not going to ever
    change. And yes, even the private SW ng has neg stuff on it but it's
    toned down.

    But, as you may understand, any idiot who has used 3D software (yes I
    use other tools) long enough can simply figure out that time applied to
    bug reporting will not get your problem fixed sooner or later. Btw,
    I've had spr's said to be fixed which were never fixed and I estimate
    the majority of bugs I have submitted will never ever be fixed so,...
    that is my reward?
    As you probably know, I've been modeling in 3D and using 3D for some 15
    years now and IMHO, the rewards for bitching, reporting bugs or not
    bitching have their balance of rewards.. the user chooses what suits
    their needs. Users with experience or people who are not
    experienced... sometimes bitch, to each his own.

    This is how I see it,.. when understanding, fairness or communication
    reach a threshold of intolerance, the realty is, bitching does have it's
    rewards and actually gets things done. Unfortunately, the more this
    happens, the little things usually get swept back or spr's are
    forgotten. And no, I do not think bitching is the right way to go about
    things. I just see it for what it has done and imho, bitching should
    not have to exist "IF" the company selling the software addressed the
    issues better. It's that simple, balancing that tolerance threshold
    (problems) for the relationship (SW Corp and the Users) to survive is
    generally (because they get paid) SW Corps responsibility. The users
    pay SW Corp for that service.
    It's actually funny to me because, I pay SW Corp annually to fixed bugs
    and regressions,.. but there is no relationship with SW Corp which says
    I have to report bugs or regressions... so I automatically become the
    bitch!? That is, all users are bitches!?

    Anyhow, I do not trust who you are (prove it) and yes it would be easier
    to believe you are associated with SW or a Resellar. I've been ~90%
    correct on this assumption (or the user use too work for SW or VAR) so
    I do not trust you and I do not trust you see the full scope of the
    issues/problems (yeah people bitch and guess what they also post
    reports as well = double masochism), otherwise, I think you are trying
    to be rational but ultimately naive

    Otherwise if your submissive rational is to use that pissed off energy
    to better help regardless of the problems, or bend over and take it,...
    well that would be fine if I saw the balance to the relationship
    (getting screwed) but I don't (I'm getting fucked) so I by helping, I'm
    helping too fuel the software companies inability's = dysfunctionality =
    bad relationship = problems = bitching.

    If a fair relationship between SW Corp and the users existed maybe
    things would be different?? I've always felt there should be more
    needed to balance the relationship.
    Otherwise, keeping things as they are or bending over and taking it and
    bitching will remain a constant.... hey, we're conditioned and this is
    normal??

    Sincerely yours and happy winter solstice. 8^)

    ...
     
    Paul Salvador, Dec 21, 2003
    #27
  8. Dear Santa,

    For my present,... could you please return the JB person back to
    whatever planet (I think it's called planet USHM, where only small job
    shops using TI calculators and only Demo software exist?) he came from?

    Oh, btw, you've got 4 days so, chop-chop!!

    p.s., no milk and cookies if you do not succeed.

    ... ;^)
     
    Paul Salvador, Dec 21, 2003
    #28
  9. Sorry, they dont have time. Theyre fixing all 374 of mine first ;oP

    By "alternative solutions", do you mean your suggestions that you were
    going to try to publicly shame Solidworks by writing articles for an
    ezine? Or do you mean the "class action" lawsuit? Or is it your post
    about the nurses that suggests that SW is maliciously withholding bug
    fixes? Certainly you can't be serious about any of this.
    Join the club. You are not being singled out.
    I have a hard time believing this. Do you mean paying projects?
    Anyone who has a professional reputation to uphold finishes projects
    that they start come hell or high water. What did you do, just
    explain to your customer that you made a bad choice of software and
    wouldnt be able to finish the project until some unspecified time in
    the future? Or are you talking about a personal project?

    What people are failing to recognize is that success or failure is not
    tied to whether Company X fixes bug Z or not. In fact, it has nothing
    at all to do with software. Your success is dependent on your
    choices. If you choose to use a tool that cant cut it, well, as they
    say in the commercial about automated toll booths "that means
    something".
    To be fair, didn't this technique exploit a backdoor quirk about PW,
    where it was kind of a bug in PW that allowed that to happen in the
    first place, but you made use of it to do something that shouldnt have
    been possible? I know you have made a career of using back doors, but
    its hardly documented functionality. They didn't actually give you an
    spr for that, did they?
    Honestly, what system would you not criticize? Of course they have to
    prioritize things. You would probably want this to go to a vote where
    your brand of "activism" could compete.

    Another problem that people arent talking about is the fact that there
    are so many conflicting solutions that individual people want. Some
    people don't like the new transparent flyout FM that auto-expands, but
    I love it. I don't like the Command Manager, but other people do. In
    the same way, for some bugs there are multiple ways to fix it, which
    some people would consider worse than the bug itself and others would
    find perfect.

    The lesson that some people will not learn in their entire life is
    that life is neither perfect nor fair. You can waste your whole life
    fighting that fact, but in the end you will change nothing. The real
    question is how do you make use of this information. If you just go
    around feeling conspired against, and acting like a little child that
    doesnt get his way, well, youve missed a lot of opportunities. It is
    a hard pill to swallow, but there are things that you just cannot
    change, and beaureaucracy, corporate or governmental is one of them.

    Instead of wasting your energy fighting things that you cannot change,
    why not do something productive? Pick your battles more selectively.
    You strike me as the Don Quixote type, happier the more hopeless the
    cause.
    Maybe focus on completing jobs that you start? Or how about talk to
    the regional SW direct technical guy in your area? I know you feel
    ripped off if there is not some back door for you to exploit, but
    honestly, flapping about a lawsuit or trying to get slander published
    are pretty distasteful ventures, not to mention unrealistic.
    You still work for the VAR, then, it seems.

    ....
    You missed your calling, should have been an abortion activist.
    Oh god, spare us. The "amigos" was a pointless exercize of the same
    stripe. No benefit - hold it, I think Mark got a t-shirt?

    Its genuinely funny that youre trying to foment this image of yourself
    as an unappreciated martyr, and SolidWorks as a bunch of conspirators.
    Why dont you explain the "big picture" to those of us with less
    inventive imaginations? Try to do it without using the words
    "Kennedy", "UFO", "Area 51", "Roswell" or "Watergate".

    It seems you have a few supporters that dont want to believe that you
    are capable of anything distasteful. Although I appreciate some of
    the technical stuff you have posted, some of your "commentary" posts
    appear to be little short of "rabble-rousing".

    Stick to modeling, Mike, youre on surer ground there.

    Armadillo Hunter
     
    armadillo hunter, Dec 22, 2003
    #29
  10. You hide behind a hotmail alias and then call us whiners? Why do you expect
    us to take you seriously? Yeah, we get angry and criticize. I need to be
    better about complaining to my VAR and turning in SPRs. But it was an angry
    posting on this group that got the subscription boycott started, and that
    got SW's attention for at least a little while, resulting in slightly better
    testing and code. I think we need to get their attention again.

    You make a number of valid points. I hope you stick around. But calling Mike
    Wilson and Eddy Hicks whiners is patently ridiculous.


    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
     
    Jerry Steiger, Dec 22, 2003
    #30
  11. Jeff N

    jon banquer Guest

    Dear Santa,

    Thanks for granting my wish early even though I'm not Christian. It's
    been fun watching this putz get wasted and blown out over on
    alt.machines.cnc

    For this kind of special laugh I'm truly grateful. :>)

    Keep it up and perhaps I'll convert someday ! ;>)


    jon
     
    jon banquer, Dec 22, 2003
    #31
  12. Jeff N

    matt Guest

    A.H.:

    Your sentiments are noble, and possibly correct, but using the same ideas you
    write about, it could be argued that your little campaign to clean up the
    neighborhood will fail for the same reasons that the habitual complainers
    will also fail to change anything at SW corp. You can't change human nature.
    You're not going to fix world hunger, shut up Jon Banquer or keep people from
    making fools of themselves on usenet.

    Also, I'm not clear what advantages there are in accusing specific
    individuals.

    But good luck anyway.

    matt
     
    matt, Dec 22, 2003
    #32
  13. That's your opinion. Like assholes, we all have one.

    Ever heard the phrase "physician, heal theyself"? Suggesting someone should
    be an abortion activist or calling them Don Quixote doesn't strike you as a
    bit of rabble-rousing?

    You make some good points, but you're not making many points with the folks
    in the newsgroup.

    So, what's your name? What's your company name?

    Jerry Steiger
    Tripod Data Systems
     
    Jerry Steiger, Dec 22, 2003
    #33
  14. Need some more blue's clues, little jonnie?

    Pay attention now,..here's a blue's clue for you,..

    Santa has nothing to do with Christianity. Although, a lot of
    christians luv to exploit Santa and I'm sure some think elves are little
    disciplines of jesus? Or, on the flip side, a extreme christian may
    think the jews devised a santa marketing scheme to sell more product to
    the christians and non-christians because hanukah sales were down?
    Or,.. for the real extremist, Santa is actually a dyslectic Satan in
    disguise!?

    And,.. I'm curious, what wet dream are you talking about re:
    alt.machines.cnc??
    Dude, resume your chemically balanced med therapy!

    Happy solstice, jonnie... hey, btw, Santa is making a special flight to
    Planet SUHM, bring your demo disc!!

    ... (this is too easy,.. make him go away mommie)
     
    Paul Salvador, Dec 22, 2003
    #34
  15. Jeff N

    jon banquer Guest

    Try calling it a Hanukkah bush this year. Perhaps with divine intervention
    you might finally get lucky... but only if you pay her. ;>)

    jon
     
    jon banquer, Dec 22, 2003
    #35
  16. WTF!?.. So,.. god is a hooker!?

    What type of bush are you consuming at those pre-Kwanza demo parties!?

    ...
     
    Paul Salvador, Dec 22, 2003
    #36
  17. Well, I've said what I dropped in to say. Just a few parting
    thoughts. You all are pretty tough when it it comes to doling out the
    criticism, but it seems you don't like to take it nearly as well.
    Just stop and think about it for a second next time you have the urge
    to write a scathing flaming post, and ask yourself who its helping.
    Flaming when there is no chance of retaliation or being set straight
    is a cowards game. I'm not defending SW company or software, that's
    not the issue. I'm questioning a few individuals techniques which
    make this place an unpleasant one fairly frequently.

    Anyway, I will probably continue to lurk to see if things improve at
    all, and if not, I will take my own advice and act instead of
    complain. Ill likely wind up using this as a search resource instead
    of coming daily to read posts.

    So long.

    Armadillo Hunter
     
    armadillo hunter, Dec 22, 2003
    #37
  18. Jeff N

    Eddy Hicks Guest

    Who has flamed you and given you no chance of retaliation or setting them
    straight? I'm confused. You've got every opportunity to talk. We all do.
    Remember, public newsgroup.

    You came in here, nailed a few of us with BS comments and *extremely*
    offensive remarks and some of us called you on it.

    Please, go away. Or stay if you prefer. It's a free country in here.

    - Eddy
     
    Eddy Hicks, Dec 22, 2003
    #38
  19. Jeff N

    neil Guest

    I really don't see why this is such a frequently unpleasant place for you
    when you only lurk to read/use the resource and no one knows you are
    there.... you don't want to post anything yourself- why do you expect this
    NG to continuously generate Pulitzer prize content for your edification?
    I am sorry mate but you haven't really helped yourself by piping up to be
    insulting of others. this group exists for anyone interested in SW whatever
    their age, competence and disposition. I wouldn't like to see it become so
    pc that no one has any personality or character.
    cheers, have a nice xmas
    neil
     
    neil, Dec 22, 2003
    #39
  20. Jeff N

    neil Guest

    by the way how is Berlin at this time of year - you have no university
    studies to keep your mind busy now?
     
    neil, Dec 22, 2003
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.